* I've decided to put stats on, this took a bit of messing about. I'm still suspicious about the comment name tags 'Emily Bronte' and 'Windinhair' these may well be friends playing a little game. They know I think 'Shirley' by Charlotte Bronte is one of the most underrated of books and that I regard 'Wuthering Heights', the cuckoo in the nest with minimalist cast of characters and outlaws in death as a great surrealist book, despite their deriding both as chick lit. I therefore suspect a windup coming. Still might as well take the advice and check stats.
If I get any hits I'll put back deleted blog entries. I print them off and send them to Uncle Dave.
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
* Channel 4 had a much advertised program about children's ballroom dancing. This program seemed to be part of channel 4's catering for minorities, we've had programs for homosexuals, programs for lesbians and now it looked like paedophiles were getting a program. I must admit I didn't watch it all the way thru after a scene with a brother and sister on a bed I got the feeling I was watching something that wasn't very healthy. I don't know who the editor was but he had lots of shots of prepubescent girls with adult make up dressed in skimpy clothing. It did have a bit of direction at pushy parents. It also gave paedophiles a tip , not surprisingly there is a shortage of boy ballroom dancers so if you have a boy dancer you can take your pick. Don't be surprised if larger audiences turn up for these events. If I was the police I'd have a look at the production team but then maybe it's just me who felt uncomfortable.
Talking of disturbing images Skythree had a program on spontaneous combustion fronted by some old heavy metal singer. In the process of investigating if severe flatulence could be the cause of bursting into flame the frontman produced a scantily dressed female rubber sex doll which was filled with bags of gas. These were ignited and we all watched as flames shot out of the rubber dolls corresponding genital area then we watched as the doll was slowly consumed by flames. If I was a feminist I might be a little worried about the psychology behind this image, but then again maybe its all good boy fun.
The current concern with young women and body image is a bit puzzling as it appears to be a female generated problem where this obsessive body image change is a perception by females of other females and totally unrelated to any male/female dynamic. These women are not concerned with how males will perceive them as any look at male magazines or such sites as Met-Art models shows that female admired body shapes are absent. Lets face it when women buy fashion they are not getting it because they think their boyfriend will like the new look, they are getting it to signal messages to other females. So what message is concentration camp chic?
Labels: Channel 4 - doubtful envelope and bodysize
Deleted Entries
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
* The government has decided that in addition to tackling booze Britain by allowing 24 hr opening and never increasing the tax on alcohol, a demonstrable counter-intuitive move that has completely failed to provide the desired 'continental low consumption cafe style' culture, it is to tackle problem gambling by allowing more and bigger casinos with more and bigger jackpot fruit machines, another counter-intuitive move which will undoubtedly be the great success the rest of its idiot initiatives have been. How did so many useless fuckwits manage to get themselves elected and into ministerial positions. Here's hoping the whole cabinet and ex-cabinet ministers are prosecuted for selling honours.
These honours, of course, can get you membership of that other great 'bollocks Blair' legacy and success the House of Lords. It doesn't get much mention but what the fuck is the House of Lords now? It appears to be a body of government purely for the purposes of Prime-Ministerial largess. In other words its another fucking quango keeping executive power away from the people. Oh fuck these idiots have 4 years left!
* I decided to ring-up Uncle Dave to ask him how much he's been robbing off Grannie.
His long time partner told me he was very depressed and didn't want to talk to anyone. I know what that's about, it's his medicinal herb garden. He's run out of herbal remedy and is still waiting for the medicinal herbs to flower. He does this everytime by under estimating how ill he is then using up the medicine before he can replenish his store.
Not one to be put off I decided to drive over and visit. Uncle Dave was under-whelmed to see me. He was not in the least amused when I asked how much he was ripping granny off for, infact he was very rude. After he had calmed down I asked him how come the 'love and peace' generation were acting in this way. Uncle Dave was not surprised and far from launching a sterling defence he rather agreed with me that they were an envious and avaricious generation. No rudder, no anchor and nowhere to go, was Dave's verdict.
I checked up on his medicinal garden and decided to make another visit in a month's time. He should be in a much mellower and more agreeable mood by then. As I left Dave shouted, 'Don't forget your our children, be very afraid.' I wonder what he could have meant.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
* Thieving, robbing bastards - Some people have reacted to my balanced comments on worthless, useless baby-boomers, saying I have been over egging it a bit. Well skeptical readers a new report on the treatment of the elderly has shown that in 53% of cases its the ungrateful baby-boomer children who are robbing gran and granddad blind. I quote the following grabbed from the BBC website:
"Some 53% of theft, fraud and deception cases were blamed on the children of the victims. Most of the victims were women in their 80s or above and, in most cases, it was sons or daughters who were accused of trying to steal, defraud or coerce money from their elderly parents.".
This included stealing the house from under gran's feet and selling it off for the cash. If only these old people had read my blog they could have at least been prepared. This does not surprise anyone as avarice is an extolled virtue in this country where everybody is a productive unit. Lets face it Gran is not producing wealth for the nation and is thus an incredible burden on the country. "A holiday in Switzerland Mum is just what you need".
The worthless and useless boomers now running the country have decided one parent families staying at home to bring up the kids is a terrible burden on the country, they should be producing wealth and uncontrollable children instead.
Blair the boomer is supposed to be worried about his legacy! f*ck me, what legacy other than constantly passing bad law, Iraq and kissing American ass. 'Blair the ass-kisser' history will remember, if the human race lasts long enough to give him a paragraph.
Racist Joke - well it made me laugh.
Three naked men are sat in a sauna, an American, a Japanese and an Irishman. They hear a beeping sound, the American touches his arm and says, "that's my pager, I have a microchip under my skin." Next a ringtone sounds, the Japenese man lifts his palm to his ear and says, "I have a microchip in my hand." The Irishman is now feeling very low-tech, gets up goes to the toilet and comes back with toilet paper hanging from his arse. He says, "Oh Bjaybus, would you look at that, I'm getting a fax".
* BBC2 broadcast a documentary on Tchaikovsky. This was a dramatised biography. What important moments in his life did we see? Well, Young tchaikovsky crying on stairs. Tchaikovsky making eyes at 19 yr old lover (who committed suicide, no one knows why).
Tchaikovsky presents music to his seniors who slam it, but he refuses to change it (music is a big success). Tchaikovsky enjoying the St petersburg gay scene. Tchaikovsky getting a blowjob in the bushes despite chance to roger cossak. Tchaikovsky in restaurant getting advised by russian prince to trawl villages for roughtrade. Then Tchaickovsky (same scene) gets a tongue lashing from homophobic member of public. Tchaikovsky in poolroom with gay friends announcing intention to marry as he ia worried about rumours. Friend leaves in tizz. Tchaikovsky accused of denying true nature. (No mention he will be ruining some woman's life). Tchaikovsky in russian bath house with lover and mystery man. Tchaikovsky at a dance where woman makes fatal mistake of writing to him about her admiration for him. All these essential scenes explain his exquisite music.
* The Book club. Continuing my foray into literary criticism I decide to watch the book club on Skythree. This is presented by Mariella Frostrop the thinking man's ex-wife. The program was more a Mariella gets together with two women writers for a girls chat than a book program. The first writer had written a book on helen of troy, the writer herself, Mariella informed us, is found threatening by men as she is a looker and wears jeans. I've no idea what the book might contain as they mainly discussed how threatening men found Helen of Troy and then heaped the blame for the Trojan War on her. Much girl social stroking then took place. The next writer had written a novel. I've no idea what the book was about but her books in general contain characters who are feminist icons and the type of women men find threatening. They also contain lots of raunchy sex. Lots of girl social stroking then took place. Then the two females recommended books. One was the Illiad, if you didn't know what the books about you will be non-the-wiser after watching the book club. The raunchy books writer recommend Moll Flanders because its raunchy. I must admit I can't remember the other books as I was distracted by the mutual admiration going on between them. Tune in next week for more successful London women type social stroking.
Saturday, January 27, 2007
* Crap books I have read. I thought I would follow up my new career as a 'rather after the event' book reviewer with other books I had the misfortune to buy in the hope of a bit of literary entertainment.
I should warn you off any book by A. N. Wilson. I've never finished one, well before the end I've heaved the book across the room and spent a wasted few minutes wondering why it ever got written. I suspect Mr Wilson has far too much time on his hands. He's also a one trick pony, sooner or later, 'b*gg*r me, its another Anglo-Catholic'. That's all there is to say about this scribbler.
Friday, January 26, 2007
* Saturday by Ian McEwan - I was passing a bookshop and I thought I'll get myself something to read. I browsed around, normally I don't read modern literature as I find it the short route to never ever finishing a book. J G Ballard excepted, he is always entertaining. Having read 'Atonement' by Ian McEwan and found it engrossing I decided to risk another 'Saturday, No 1 Bestseller'. Normally Being a bestseller automatically scrubs a book from my list of possibles. The cover described it as 'Dazzling,profound and urgent', the quote was from the Sunday newspaper the Observer (the rational paper that promotes astrology) so I should have known better. The book should be sub-titled 'How to bluff your way in brain surgery' or neurosurgery, the correct term as the book points out (I've been talking neurosurgery speak all day). Obviously my ability to appreciate literature could be so low that I was out of my depth, however, the 'profound and urgent' tag was lost on me.
The book reads like it was written for baby-boomers at the tail end of the boom. So whats it about, well its a day in the life of a brain surgeon approaching the big 50. This guys family are the perfect guardian reader family. Our hero is a highly intelligent brain surgeon with successful lawyer wife who works for a newspaper. They have highly talented children, a boy whose a fantastic blues guitarist who has met all the 60's brit blues legends and is going to work in america with his great band, a girl who is at Oxford, has won a prestigious oxford prize for poetry, and is about to become a published poet. His wife's father is a famous, lives in france prickly old famous poet. They live in a big house in the centre of London. You can just hear the baby-boomers starting to drool.
Big surprise, he still fancies his wife and is the only brilliant english surgeon who hasn't been and never wanted to have affairs (fairytale time or what) also he isn't divorced and although approaching 50 isn't planning to dump his wife for a newer model.
It all takes place on the day of the anti-Iraq war march.
He gets up, thinks he might have seen a terrorist manned plane, has sex with his wife, goes to play squash with an anaesthetist yank, has a slight car bump with a car full of lowlifes, one of which has an incurable genetic disease that will f*ck his brain up, nearly gets beat up except his ability to spot genetic diseases of the nervous system enables him to wriggle out of a good thrashing, has the game of squash but is duped out of a win by the Yank, goes and buys some fish, goes and sees his mother who was a successful swimmer, but now has alzhiemers and doesn't know her arse from her elbow, goes home and cooks up seafood platter, see's his son perform a new song which is a really good song, goes home to great the attractive daughter with the manuscript of her book, argues with her about the war, his famous father-in-law arrives, his son arrives, his wife arrives unwillingly accompanied by two lowlifes. The genetic disorder lowlife waves a knife about, gives granddad a broken nose, makes the daughter strip off with intention to rape, on stripping all can see she is three months pregnant, genetic disorder lowlife spots manuscript of poetry, makes her read one, granddad hints she should recite mathew arnold, lowlife is overcome with beauty of poem and makes her read/recite again (yeah right), forgets about rape and takes up docs offer of treatment for the disorder that the doc made up because their is no treatment, so upto the docs study the two of them go, other lowlife leaves, son runs upstairs, lowlife gets thrown down stairs. Ambulance comes, police come, hospital rings need doc to operate on lowlife, doc goes in saves lowlifes life, goes home discovers father of daughter is Italian archaeologist who has place on prestigious dig, chats with wife, goes to sleep, wakes up looks out window sees plane.
All this is padded with descriptions of neurosurgery and events from the past.
Only thing missing was they learn they had a big win on the lottery. The last phrase should have been "they lived happily ever after".
Still I was always uncomfortable with realism and profound metaphors.
Thursday, January 25, 2007
* The Catholic adoption service is not going to be given an exemption from placing children with Gay (male/female) couples. There is talk of giving the Catholic adoption service a three year (or other amount of time) 'come to terms with it' period. This is bloody silly idea, are they expecting Catholic theologians to suddenly change their minds. Oh! the british are right we've been wrong for 2000 years.
Rather surprisingly, given the number of gay clergy, the church of England has backed the Roman Catholic Church in its stance on adoption. Whether the Catholic church was comforted or alarmed by this, I do not know.
Interestingly a friend tells me (I'm assuming he's right) that in St Pauls epistles where a list of various behaviours that are unacceptable are given the Greek term translated as homosexuals is actually the term 'butt-fuckers', I don't know where that leaves lesbians then?
On the radio a gay commentator told us that the Catholic church is worse than the Klu Klux Klan! This means Opus Dei must have more clout than we thought. I have read nothing in the papers about gays being burnt alive in their houses nor had I heard of gays mutilated bodies found hanging from trees. I will be writing to my MP to demand he stand up in the House and expose these homicidal goings on.
* As it is now obvious that the public support the Gay community, isn't it time to bring back the amendment to the Gay discrimination bill to allow sexual activity in public toilets. The failure to include this in the bill has meant lots of shivering in public parks. This would also save Debenhams from sending in a female cleaner everytime a member of the public complains that the men's toilets are full of males all hanging about outside of the cubicles. How people can say they find this threatening or it makes them uncomfortable when they are referred to as 'love', I cannot understand. Nobody ever makes any comment when heterosexual couples stream out of the cubicles while they are admiring the porcelain.
* Trophy Wives.
Another item of interest in the land of the politically correct is that men are now dumping their 'trophy wives' i.e. Lookers who stay at home warming the bed. They are replacing them with women who have a substantial incomes of their own. Why is this? you are probably wondering, apparently it's because they have more in common with high powered business women and can communicate their anxieties and problems and get support!
Yeah, right. A more likely explanation is that after the novelty of humping a stunner and making their friends envious has worn off, they come home from work and are confronted by someone who wants some attention, wants to go out on the town, wants to talk, wants to please him with a s**g. They instead want to have a single malt and sit infront of their media centre. Knowing that the looker wife will grab a fair portion of the available income, they are looking for additional funding. Now to his relief they are both knackered when he gets home, no need for any conversation and he can go back to having an understanding mistress who he only has to see when he can be bothered.
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
* The big item in the news was the Roman Catholic Church Adoption Agency. This was portrayed as a threat by the church to close down their adoption agencies if providing a service for gay couples was forced upon them. As this was a more provocative headline than the actual position it was persisted by the BBC with an occasional explanation that in fact as the church could not provide their service to gay couples then they would receive no public funding and therefore would have to close.
The main point was that the RC church places 40% of disabled and difficult children for adoption, but only 4% of all adoptions. Unfortunately the church believes a family to consist of a male and female plus x number of children.
A gay rights representative came on and astonished us by telling us lots of gay couples look after just these type of children. It seemed then a no-brainer the gay community can take up the slack if the 40% placement by the RC church disappears. In order to provide a response a couple of old gays (male) were wheeled on, they were apparently too old to adopt. The exchanges were uninteresting until the old queen suddenly announced that coming from a Scottish Presbyterian background he had reservations about the Catholic church and sexual behaviour. Unfortunately he was cut short so we found out no more. Why this fascinating insight was not pursued is a mystery. What is it Scottish Presbyterians know?
It appears that thinking the gay sub-culture is no place for children is politically incorrect which puts the gay male who expressed this opinion to me in an amusing position, being against gay adoption himself on this basis. Obviously a good candidate for re-education by the police.
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
* If you want a good site to pick up freeware progs that are worth downloading why not visit http://fileforum.betanews.com/
* Order or rather lack of in schools. A video of an asian school teacher trying to control a class of pupils was put on the net and generally condemned for racist abuse. The fact that the class was obviously out of control received little comment. It seems to me that its time to divorce teaching from discipline. A teacher is not a stand in parent whose job is to modify the behaviour of pupils.
The job of discipline should be the responsibility of a separate group of employees in the school. In the case of order breaking down the teacher should merely press a button to call employees responsible for order, point out the pupils concerned and have them removed. The idiots concerned can be taken to a separate area.
The teacher can get on with the job of teaching.
Ever since the idiot liberals got their hands on schools nothing but increasing chaos and failure has resulted. The public now expects the schools to raise their children, if the little f**kers can't behave they should be just handed back to the parent/s where ever they happen to be e.g. at their place of work, at home, etc.
Monday, January 22, 2007
* On and on it runs the big brother racist or not saga. Now they want channel 4's franchise revoked, not because of the utter dross they broadcast, but because they didn't intervene soon enough, comment enough, broadcast an apology to the world or some other similar reason. We are talking about Ms Goody here a bear of very little brain. Unfortunately she is now a being subject to the English sport of kick the celeb', never a pretty sight.
I did learn something new though, someone who had previously been on big brother said she'd been a victim of 'evasive racism'. What? What the f*ck is evasive racism I thought. Needless to say this appears to have originated amongst the politically correct in the USA. This form of racism is worse than the old racism. This is where your a racist but don't let on to anyone or only to a small number of like minded evasive racists.
In the old days racists would use terms such as wog, wop, kike, dago, etc which enabled you to identify them and deal with the problem, but now the sneaky bastards aren't letting on so nobody knows who they are. Obviously we need the thought police to look into this new brand of racism and expose them. 'Are you or have you ever been an evasive racist?' seems the right question.
The ludicrous baby-boomers running this country with there idiotic laws against opinions are in need of a good turfing-out. The idiotic fatuous bastards.
In order to wind up the thought police I have printed a T-shirt up with the following slogan on it. Why not copy the image size it up and wear it yourself.
If asked, 'What is it you can't say?', reply 'I'll have to think about that one.'
If asked 'What are you thinking?', reply 'I'd rather not say.' I find it evokes interesting responses where ever I go.
Labels: Looks suspicious